The article can be found here.
This article is about the conflicts that arise with farm-to-school movements. A lot of work goes into preparing fresh produce, many of the lunch workers are not chefs, they are there because they like the kids. They often lack proper culinary training because most of the food they receive is already processed cutting and preparing is a whole different process. Because schools feed so many students, small local farmers may not be able to supply the bushels and pounds needed for each meal. Larger school districts face challenges in finding enough fresh foods and
the costs of hand-preparing foods on a large scale. Smaller districts
may not have proper equipment or storage space, and workers may need
culinary training (article).
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, signed by Barack Obama on December 13, 2010, funds standard child nutrition and school lunch programs. One of the new nutrition standards is to provide resources for schools and communities to utilize local farms and gardens to provide fresh produce. I think that it is important that we are making healthy food a standard in our schools and that we are doing our best to integrate the local farms. Though it has faced some challenges, the health of our nation is important enough that we should continue to pursue change at root of it all: the children. If we enforce healthy eating from the start, it becomes easier for kids to make healthier decisions on their own. I think it was necessary that our federal government stepped in and gave an overall standard for our nation to strive toward. Though serving healthier food in schools will inevitably cost more, taxpayers could decide it's worth it. A recent Wisconsin poll found 77
percent of 300 people surveyed said they were willing to pay more for
locally grown foods in schools (article). All in all, I think it's important that we support our local farms, incorporate more fresh produce in our schools, and provide proper culinary training to our lunch workers.
I agree. Despite the many complaints from schools (and some even dropping out of the program), if the people who are paying for such programs (i.e. taxpayers) are willing to do so I see no reason why schools should stop improving children's health.
ReplyDeleteOur country needs more fruit!
ReplyDeleteSolid job on explaining your opinion. I completely agree.
I agree, but one thing bothers me about the law. I think that the fresh produce should be available for the kids to eat, but they shouldn't be forced to take extra. If the main meals could be healthier, that would be brilliant, but forcing kids to eat fruit doesn't seem right. It should be their choice to take it or not, that way less would be thrown away. I think the main meals should be the bigger part of having a healthier school lunch.
ReplyDelete